Sometimes a crumb falls from the tables of joy
Sometimes a bone is flung.
To some people love is given,
To others, only heaven.
Langston Hughes
Introduction
Sadness and joy are not opposites.
They exist as two notes of a sometimes
dissonant, sometimes harmonious, chord of quiet awareness. Learning
to
experience and accept one’s sadness as part of the unfolding perfection
of Being is
to make the darkness visible, and beautiful. It is a gate into
deeply knowing that
all is God.
Denying sorrow, or pretending too
quickly that everything is okay, denies
that God exists everywhere, which contradicts the unity and reality
of God itself.
If God takes place only when we are happy, it is not God.
Sadness is not the same as
despair. Despair is a condition of the ego, in
which the “I” loses confidence that the sad mind state will change.
It is part of a
narrative, in which the desired happiness is feared never to come.
Sadness is not
part of a narrative; it is simply what is, at this moment. In
fact, despair hates
sadness, and seeks to avoid it – even as it believes that to avoid
it is impossible.
In this sense, despair and holy sadness are opposites.
When we truly experience,
not just merely learn, that sadness is a
manifestation of God, and when we feel -- not just merely theorize
-- that we are
not alone in sadness, we can become one with an underlying peace with
what is
that lovingly endures even our most painful heartbreaks.
The teachings in this book
flow from many voices of Jewish traditions,
and some from Buddhist ones, though hopefully they can inspire any
seeker of
communion with ultimate Being. They do not represent the only
voices in these
traditions on the subject of sadness, or even the dominant ones.
Most importantly,
this path is not a cure for sadness – it is an embrace of it.
The gate of sadness will
not make us happy. But it can make us joyful, content, and loving
in the midst of
pain. With an open heart, sadness and joy may thus be united.
1.
Nothing exists apart from
God. All of Being, including that which we
consider the self, is a vast, infinitely complex manifestation of the
One. This is
easy to say, but difficult truly to know.
Scientific understandings
of the universe have begun to resemble the
teachings of wisdom traditions, in particular the unity of matter (substance)
and
energy (non-substance), of the unified fabric of spacetime, of how
only the
presence of information (“wisdom”) determines the shape of the universe,
from
our innermost thoughts to the contours of galaxies. But even
if such theories are
correct, map is not territory. To directly and fully experience
this simple point –
that all is in God – requires a shift in our minds and hearts.
To attain this deep form
of knowledge (in Hebrew, daat), many mystics
and contemplatives carefully train their minds not to constrict into
the false
conceptions and attachments of the self; artists gain glimpses of the
Infinite in
selfless moments of creative expression; and all of us arrive at moments
of
transcendence, if we are open to receive them. In all cases,
the resultant
experience is often one of great rapture and joy. With the veil
of separateness
removed, many contemplatives encounter an overpowering love radiating
from
the unity of Being. That which we thought was far from us is,
in fact, us. Or
rather, we are It.
This experience is so wonderful
that it is often radically misunderstood.
We hear about rapture and joy, and assume that it is only in such moments
that we
are connected with God. In fact, such moments are moments only
of recognition.
Since God is absolutely everywhere, we are always fully connected with
God,
even when we experience great sadness.
It is easy to draw a map
of how this is so. But to understand deeply that
even in our moments of greatest separateness, aloneness, or pain, there
is nothing
but God taking place – this is the challenge of liberation.
2.
In the Jewish tradition,
becoming filled with the Divine is described in
many ways, including devekut (cleaving, or merging with, God),
achdut
(unifying), and others. Since ontologically, we are always nothing
but God, these
terms must represent primarily epistemological or psychological states.
God is
always here; but sometimes our attention is not.
It is tempting to wax rhapsodic
about becoming filled with the shechinah,
the immanent Presence of God. But how do we regard these other
times? The
times at which our illusory wills and selfish interests seem to us
to be the entirety
of life’s meaning?
Traditional Jews begin every
morning’s prayer service with the words of a
non-Jewish prophet, Balaam, who had been sent to curse the Israelites
by Balak,
an idolatrous king. On his journey, Balaam had been blind to
the reality of God’s
presence, but when he arrived at the Israelite camp he was filled with
insight, and
in his joy uttered this well-known line: mah tovu ohalecha ya’akov,
mishkenotecha yisrael. How good are your tents, Jacob; your dwelling
places,
Israel.
In the parallel structure
of Balaam’s speech, we can see a microcosm of
the mind states of gadlut (great mind, when we know we are filled with
God) and
katnut (small mind, when we do not think we are). The “tents
of Jacob” represent
katnut – grasping mind; Ya’akov, whose first act was to grasp the ankle
of his
twin brother Esau; Jacob, who stole his brother’s blessing and tried
to live his life;
mere tents. The “dwelling places of Israel” are gadlut; Yisrael,
he who wrestles
with, embraces God; the person who has become transformed; dwelling
places
made into mishkenot for the shechinah.
Yet Balaam does not say that
only Israel’s mishkenot are tov (good). He
does not say how wonderful it is when (and only when) our finite tents
are
transformed into places for the Infinite. He says that both sides
are good.
Moreover, according to the
Zohar, the word Mah, which ordinarily means
‘what’ or ‘how,’ is a signifier of the shechinah. With this understanding,
mah
tovu teaches us that ultimate Goodness, the Presence of God, inheres
both in our
times of Yisrael, when it is obvious, and our times of Yaakov, when
it is not.
Devekut with God is all-inclusive. When we cry, when we feel
isolated, when we
encounter loneliness or pain – these too are tov, Good. All of our
soul is purely
God, even those parts which are absolutely sure that, whatever God
is, they are
not God, even those parts our egos regret or despise.
3.
Human beings seem capable
of great, radical evil, from the massive scale
of the Holocaust to the minute scale of individual cruelty and violence.
How is
this tov?
The conceptual and theoretical
problems of evil will be discussed later.
For now, though, we should be wary of the trap they pose: inviting
in the rational,
critical mind. There is nothing wrong with the rational, critical
mind, of course.
But the trap is that we use it to avoid real openness. It is
easier to think of the
Holocaust than it is to deeply experience our own loss or loneliness.
If an
objection arises, make sure it is one which involves the whole soul.
Na’ar hayiti, v’gam zakanti,
v’lo raiti tzadik ne’ezav – I was a youth, and
now have grown old, and I have never seen a righteous person abandoned.
Was
the Psalmist naive? Did he (or she) lead a sheltered life, in
which no one
suffered? We know from David’s own biography that he felt abandoned
himself,
and saw righteous people of his generation betrayed and even killed.
So whether
David wrote the Psalms, or someone else did in his name, clearly the
line cannot
be ontologically descriptive.
The secret teaching of lo
raiti tzadik ne’ezav is that love is stronger than
death (as Franz Rosenzweig said). The tzadik was never abandoned
by the
underlying Presence of God, because the ‘Now’ is always available.
As one
contemporary teacher has said, “Pain is mandatory. Suffering
is not.” Suffering is
caused by our desire for pain not to exist. When we recognize
pain as what it is,
our experience of pain can be accompanied by a knowledge of deep, abiding
joy.
This is true even in the
most heinous circumstances of war and privation,
and in our own lives. It is not OK to be victimized by evil.
But Awareness is not
about the OK. It is a ground deeper than that which is entirely
not OK.
4.
In the Jewish tradition,
‘secret’ wisdom is experiential wisdom. That is
why it is not committed to books – not because it is a proprietary
formula, but
because it cannot be written at all.
When I was younger, I would
imagine that somewhere, there was the book
with The Answer. I even found a book that had the answers to
famous Zen koans.
It explained the sound of one hand clapping. It did not make
me enlightened.
Likewise, the ‘answers’ in
Abraham Abulafia, the great ecstatic Kabbalist,
are often less important than the process through which the answers
are received.
Really, what answers are there? All is God. Cogito ergo
sum – thought produces
the illusion of selfhood. But there is nothing to the self, or
to anything else, other
than the or ein sof, the Infinite Light. Is there anything new
here?
The secret does not lie in
the translation of experience into information – it
lies precisely in the opposite. In Abulafian practice, to arrive
at the place where
the Divine shefa (‘influx’) flows freely requires a change of consciousness
into a
place in which connections are seen everywhere and the normally, falsely
solid
aspects of the world splinter apart into their constituent elements.
It is not hard to
write down how this practice is done, or to relate some of the insights
that
Abulafia gained by means of it. If it can be written, it is not
sod (secret). Secrets
are not concealed for the sake of mystery. They are unwritten
because there is no
alternative.
5.
In our culture, sadness is
either a sin or a disease. Once, America
recognized it as an inevitable part of a sincere life: Abraham Lincoln’s
melancholy was seen as part of his wisdom. Now, it is seen as
Unamerican,
indulgent, almost European. Sorrow is diagnosed as depression,
and medicated
with drugs; after all, why else would one be sad, unless one were sick?
In Buddhism, that life is
suffering is one of the four noble truths. It is said
to stem not from illness, but from the natural human propensity to
want the world
to be other than it is. This propensity is essential to our survival
as a species –
without want, no neanderthal would ever hunt or build a home.
The Talmud says,
“Without the desirous inclination, nothing would ever be accomplished.”
Yet it
also ensures our unhappiness, since the world will never conform to
our desires.
We can still enjoy life’s
pleasures, and must still seek to alleviate suffering
in others, but we can only gain happiness by not attaching ourselves
to the desire
that the world be different.
One of the most important
desires to let go is the desire not to be sad.
Often, when we feel sad, it is primarily at the fact that we are sad.
Everyone else
seems so happy – and they don’t deserve it. Why can’t I
be? What is wrong with
me? Or, perhaps our sorrow turns to anger: How hateful is the
world, that some
people are given love, success, and happiness, while I am not.
For many people,
the most important step on a path to equanimity is accepting
our sadness.
Acceptance of sadness is
not the same as immersion in it. Immersion
comes when we repeat the story of why we are sad; what is lacking;
what aspects
of the world should be different. We become enveloped by the
sadness, wrapped
up in its stories and resultant despair. Acceptance, though,
comes from seeing
that we are sad, and seeing that this, too, is God.
We must actually believe
that the sound we hear now, at this moment,
here, is perfect. John Cage tried to teach this in 4'33" and
other works. Beautiful
music is not only pleasant melodies. What you are hearing now
is the perfect
symphony of the now. What are you hearing now? What part
of it is, do you
think, not God?
If not John Cage, then the
simple words of George Harrison can also teach,
even if some may find them worthy of derision. Sometimes simple
teachings are
the best teachings:
If you’re listening to this song,
You might think the chords are going wrong.
But they’re not.
I just wrote it like that.
Now, if this is true for
sounds, it is true for the soul as well: If you’re
listening to yourself, you might think the heart is going wrong. But
it’s not. God
just is like that.
This is not a teaching to
dwell on pain and wallow in self-pity. Those are
attempts to make sadness something other than what it is – part of
a story of how
we really do deserve something better, or a story about how sadness
is more noble
and exalted than happiness. Sadness is painful. It is not
better than happiness.
Both are perfect.
6.
Psalm 150 teaches that kol
haneshama tehallel yah. This may mean one of
two things. Either it means that “every soul shall praise Yah”
or it means that “the
whole soul shall praise Yah.”
Both sides of this teaching
are valuable. Every person has the opportunity
to make his or her life an inchoate praise of the One. And the
whole soul; all of it.
So there is no part of any soul that does not, as it is and with what
we perceive it
to be its flaws, praise God.
Part of the God-process within
each individual is the propensity to believe
that the self has needs and wants, and to try to advance those wants.
In this, the
self is going to be disappointed, though it may succeed to some degree
too. The
critical point is that however much we do or do not succeed in meeting
what we
think are the self’s needs, this success is not equivalent with how
much we are
praising God. (If the self’s advancement comes at the price of
causing suffering,
it may even be diametrically opposed.) We can also praise God
from our tears –
and to do so, in the Jewish tradition, is the most sincere form of
prayer.
Sadness is not an expression
of the heart to be discarded in favor of those
which are better. To believe that everything happens as it must
is not to be
fatalistic and cowed; it is not to believe everything happens for the
best; it is to
understand that sadness is part of the unfolding of the God Process.
Praise God
with it. Even that which is not, apparently, for our best may
be turned to an
instrument of praise. Not by denying its painfulness, but by
deeply seeing this
soul, in this body, at this moment, as manifesting the unfolding of
the One. The
pain is real, and it is God.
|